Sunday, March 3, 2013

Week 8: Traditional vs. Non Traditional Media

 
Traditional vs. Non Traditional Media
Week 8 Reflections
 
Borrowed from Google Images: www.cartoonstock.com -
 
 
Well, this past week I read a lot about the differences between old (traditional) media and new (virtual/social media).  Like all things, the social media has pros and cons. I think it’s safe to say that that one pro about social media is the speed at which it hits the virtual press is faster and appeals to a larger population than traditional media.  The readings this past week show that the trend for getting news via newspaper is taking a back seat to social media news flashes posted on Twitter as one example. People are tuning in and surfing a multitude of online news related information and they are doing it much faster than by picking up the paper or waiting to watch the 6 or 11 pm news to get the latest stories. According to Mitchell & Rosenstiel (March 19, 2012) social media offers a “larger pool sources” for journalists to collaborate offering a “stronger and wider connection with the community both locally and globally.­­”
                                                                                                            
Social media is giving traditional journalists a run for their money. It has been reported that journalists need to “adjust their ideology” (Mitchell & Rosenstiel, 2012) that they are the only news finders and news sharers.  Social media is affording the average Joe/Jill the opportunity to get the news out and often these breaking news stories are done with the use of cell phones complete with photos and videos.   Some journalists are in favor of using these “average Joe/Jill sources as supplemental sources others are not. On the other hand, the wide spread use of social media is a bit like journalists having a large staff working behind the scenes for them, one that they don’t have to pay!
 
The con of getting sources through the ‘average Joe/Jill’ can have some negative outcomes, aka, misinformation…or partial coverage of a story. For this reason, journalists, all the more need to get the ‘whole’ story and present it with the professional ethics they hold with no evidence of bias or favoritism.

This week I also re-visited my Delicious and Diigo Accounts., two social bookmarking tools.
I had previously obtained accounts for these two sites for a previous course.  Here is my Diigo url: Roseanne's Diigo and here is my Delicious url: Roseanne's Delicious.


As this was my second time using these two social booking marking sites, I was not totally unaware of what they offered. Both collect bookmarks; but, what differs among them is how the information is presented.  Both have the feature to add tags. Outside of the class, I don’t use either of these. I used the USF library online data base to look for articles that were related to Facebook, Social Media, and public libraries. I used the bookmark link on the left hand side of the page of the journal articles. After you click on the tool, one is able to chose where to send the bookmark to by choosing one of the many bookmarks listed. This tool made it much easier to add new bookmarks. I liked that feature.:)

References
Mitchell, A. & Rosenstiel, T. (March 19, 2012). State of the news media 2012: An annual report
 

 


No comments:

Post a Comment